Abstract Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising class of therapeutics with a broader therapeutic window than conventional chemotherapeutic agents, owing to their efficient and specific drug delivery. In addition, some ADCs produce a bystander-killing effect through mechanisms such as soluble toxic mediators, gap junction intercellular communication, immune-mediated killing, or Fc-mediated effector functions. This effect benefits not only antigen-expressing tumor cells, but also adjacent antigen-negative cells. Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) is a transmembrane glycoprotein highly expressed in many epithelial cancers and serves as an attractive target for ADC development. In this study, we assessed the bystander-killing effect of two Trop-2-targeted ADCs—sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd). To evaluate this effect, we used both in vitro co-culture assays and in vivo mixed-cell xenograft tumor models. Three cell line pairs (BxPC-3/UM-UC-3, HCC1806/UM-UC-3, NCI-N87/UM-UC-3) were selected for the in vitro assay based on Trop-2 expression. Dato-DXd exhibited higher payload release in both the BxPC-3 group and the BxPC-3/UM-UC-3 co-culture group compared to UM-UC-3 alone, which showed minimal payload release. In contrast, SG demonstrated similar payload release across all groups. Cell proliferation assays revealed that Dato-DXd had potent cytotoxicity against Trop-2-positive cells (BxPC-3, HCC1806, NCI-N87) but was ineffective in UM-UC-3 cells. Conversely, SG exhibited comparable cytotoxicity across all four cell lines. Notably, Dato-DXd reduced the viability of UM-UC-3 cells in all co-culture groups, with the BxPC-3/UM-UC-3 group showing the strongest bystander effect (80% inhibition of UM-UC-3 cells). Unlike Dato-DXd, SG exhibited strong cytotoxicity in both co-culture and UM-UC-3 groups. A similar observation was made in vivo using a mixture of BxPC-3 and UM-UC-3-Luc cell line-derived xenograft model, with tumor volume monitored via imaging. These results demonstrate that co-culture systems and in vivo imaging are valuable tools for ADC drug discovery. Both in vitro and in vivo assays are essential for understanding bystander-killing mechanisms and predicting clinical success. Citation Format: Chong Wang, Mengya Tong, Tan Pang, Jingqi Huang. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the bystander-killing effect of ADCs abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 744.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chong Wang
Mengya Tong
Tan Pang
Cancer Research
Pharmaron (United Kingdom)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd9ca79560c99a0a3ce2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-744
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: