Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
As we have observed,1 analysis of survival data requires special techniques because some observations are censored as the event of interest has not occurred for all patients. For example, when patients are recruited over two years one recruited at the end of the study may be alive at one year follow up, whereas one recruited at the start may have died after two years. The patient who died has a longer observed survival than the one who still survives and whose ultimate survival time is unknown. The table shows data from a study of conception in subfertile women.2 The event is conception, and women “survived” until they conceived. One woman conceived after 16 months (menstrual cycles), whereas several were followed for shorter time periods during which they did not conceive; their time to conceive was thus censored. View this table: Time (months) to conception or censoring in 38 sub-fertile women after laparoscopy and hydrotubation2 We wish to estimate the proportion surviving (not having conceived) by any given time, …
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Martin Bland
Doug Altman
BMJ
St George's, University of London
St George's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bland et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5717b75589c71d767e245 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1572
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: