Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We present the Natural Questions corpus, a question answering data set. Questions consist of real anonymized, aggregated queries issued to the Google search engine. An annotator is presented with a question along with a Wikipedia page from the top 5 search results, and annotates a long answer (typically a paragraph) and a short answer (one or more entities) if present on the page, or marks null if no long/short answer is present. The public release consists of 307,373 training examples with single annotations; 7,830 examples with 5-way annotations for development data; and a further 7,842 examples with 5-way annotated sequestered as test data. We present experiments validating quality of the data. We also describe analysis of 25-way annotations on 302 examples, giving insights into human variability on the annotation task. We introduce robust metrics for the purposes of evaluating question answering systems; demonstrate high human upper bounds on these metrics; and establish baseline results using competitive methods drawn from related literature.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kwiatkowski et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d83cd48c03fbaff8bee661 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00276
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Tom Kwiatkowski
Jennimaria Palomaki
Olivia Redfield
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Google (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...