Non-cohesive earth dams are widely distributed in natural and semi-engineering scenarios, and overtopping-induced breaches are their most catastrophic failure mode. Accurate prediction of the overtopping failure process and breach evolution is critical for risk assessment, emergency management, and dam design optimization. In this study, an improved 3D numerical method is developed to simulate the coupled hydrodynamic–erosion–breach evolution processes of non-cohesive earth dams. The model based on the finite volume method integrates three core modules: a hydrodynamic module based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations with the Volume of Fluid method for free surface tracking, a dam material erosion module considering particle entrainment and transport mechanisms of non-cohesive soils, and a breach development module coupling erosion and gravitational collapse. To validate the model, two levels of verification are conducted: first, a classic benchmark dam break case is employed to confirm the feasibility of the hydrodynamic and breach evolution algorithms; second, published flume experimental data of non-cohesive earth dam overtopping failures are adopted to evaluate the model accuracy in predicting breach hydrographs and spatiotemporal evolution of breach geometry. The results demonstrate that the proposed model accurately reproduces the key characteristics of overtopping failure with high fidelity. The predicted breach flow rates and flow depths are in excellent agreement with experimental observations, with relative errors less than 5% for both peak discharge and time to peak. Consequently, this study provides a reliable numerical tool for detailed simulation of non-cohesive earth dam breaches and offers scientific support for emergency management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shengyao Mei
Yu Li
Juan Xu
Water
Hohai University
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
PowerChina (China)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mei et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893626c1944d70ce046ef — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w18070880
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: