Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Modern Natural Language Processing (NLP) makes intensive use of deep learning methods because of the accuracy they offer for a variety of applications. Due to the significant environmental impact of deep learning, costbenefit analysis including carbon footprint as well as accuracy measures has been suggested to better document the use of NLP methods for research or deployment. In this paper, we review the tools that are available to measure energy use and CO 2 emissions of NLP methods. We describe the scope of the measures provided and compare the use of six tools (carbon tracker, experiment impact tracker, green algorithms, ML CO2 impact, energy usage and cumulator) on named entity recognition experiments performed on different computational set-ups (local server vs. computing facility). Based on these findings, we propose actionable recommendations to accurately measure the environmental impact of NLP experiments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nesrine Bannour
Sahar Ghannay
Aurélie Névéol
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Université Paris-Saclay
École Nationale Supérieure d’Informatique pour l’Industrie et l’Entreprise
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bannour et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8ff13ade63f05b9bee172 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.sustainlp-1.2
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: