What is cognition? Is it computation, information processing, or a thermodynamic necessity? Energy-Efficiency Theory (EET) provides a first-principles answer grounded in the v5. 7 constitutional architecture: cognition is the physical execution of causal modeling under finite energy. It is the neural-carrier instantiation of the MEER Audit Graph and the Four-Stage Protocol --- the flesh of the Modeling Theory, and the unique dual-helix convergence point where the Physical Constitution and the Cognitive Constitution meet in a single constraint network architecture. This paper develops the complete ontology of cognition from the generative foundations of EET Core Rules v5. 7 and the companion ontologies. Version 2. 4 establishes the following constitutional architecture: 1. Cognition as the Dual-Helix Convergence Point. Cognition is the only phenomenon in EET that simultaneously belongs to the Physical Constitution (as a constraint network executing physical operations) and the Cognitive Constitution (as the process of modeling under finite energy). Every Cut is both a physical constraint formation event (L0/L1) and a cognitive distinction (L2). This dual identity makes the Ontology of Cognition the physical anchor of the entire Cognitive Constitution --- the ``hardware description language'' through which every structural operation defined in any other cognitive ontology is physically realized. 2. The Adjudication Cut as a STANDARD Constitutional Operation. The Adjudication Cut --- the metacognitive decision of whether to invest response energy in probing a given node --- is elevated from Working Hypothesis to STANDARD constitutional status. It is the operational expression of the Self-Refer operation in the cognitive domain, the physical mechanism of Spectrum Right/Wrong adjudication, and the core function of the Third Self. Its three outputs (``Skip, '' ``Probe, '' ``Meltdown'') correspond to the three fundamental cognitive strategies: maintain, extend, or restructure the constraint network. 3. Maintenance and Inertia as Distinct Dynamical Consequences. Barrier Asymmetry (Eb^melt Eb^form), an L0 derived theorem (Core Rules v5. 7, §0. 3. 6), generates two independent dynamical consequences: maintenance (the continuous payment of Ė₌₀₈₍ to sustain existing constraints, producing the drive of self-preservation) and inertia (the situational resistance to structural reconfiguration, producing felt resistance to change). These are distinct in their energy sources, temporal profiles, and phenomenological correlates. Version 2. 4 formally disentangles them. 4. Cognition as the Physical Substrate of the Entire Cognitive Constitution. Every structural operation defined in the EET cognitive constitutions --- every Cut in Generative Grammar, every contradiction state in Contradiction Ontology, every node creation/deletion in the MEER Audit Graph, every Right/Wrong verdict in the Truth Spectrum --- is physically realized as a neural operation described by the Ontology of Cognition. Cognition is the ``hardware description language'' in which all other cognitive operations are ultimately executed. 5. The Cognitive YEC as the Neural-Carrier Instance of the Four-Stage Protocol. The cognitive Energy-Efficiency Cycle (Disturbance → Response → Stabilization → Constraint → Transition) is the neural implementation of Modelology's Four-Stage Protocol. Every modeling operation prescribed by Modelology is physically executed by a specific phase of the cognitive YEC, providing bidirectional validation that the Cognitive Constitution's methodological grammar has a physical neural realization. 6. Consciousness as the Cognitive Immune System. Consciousness (1) is the only cognitive state capable of actively detecting, isolating, and eliminating Pseudo-Shi (low-MEER cognitive structures). It functions as the cognitive immune system, with effectiveness governed by XQ (Adjudication Cut precision), which decays irreversibly with constraint accumulation, providing the physical basis for the inverted-U trajectory of Wisdom across the lifespan. 7. The Inertia-Response Spectrum as the Interoception of Being-as-Resistance. The six intervals of the inertia-response spectrum --- quiescence, caution, aversion, fear, despair, dissolution --- are the direct interoceptive readout of the feasibility ratio R in a constraint network with interoceptive capacity. Fear is not an added layer on top of existence --- it is existence itself, Being-as-Resistance, experienced from the inside when its maintenance is threatened. The framework establishes the complete functional architecture of cognition from atomic cognitive points to global cognitive systems, the neural dynamics of predictive coding and cross-level integer-ratio resonance as the basis of consciousness, the Adjudication Cut as the metacognitive resource gatekeeper, the constitutional distinction between maintenance and inertia, and the three normative dimensions of cognitive dynamics --- Intelligence (MEER₀₂₇₈₄ₕ₄₃), Rationality (Protocol compliance), and Wisdom (long-term XQ management, constitutionally bounded by the Ben-Shi Irreversibility Law). A comprehensive appendix documents the convergence between the EET cognition ontology and independent research programs from 2025--2026, presenting these findings not as external evidence but as necessary derivations from EET's root axioms. Cognition is the flesh of modeling, and causality is its grammar. Every Cut is a causal judgment; every chunk is a submerged causal chain. The Adjudication Cut guards the gate; attention allocates the budget; submersion locks in the gains. Consciousness is the cognitive immune system --- the river of critical synchronization that detects and eliminates degenerated structure. Spirit is the riverbed of inertial consolidation. Keywords: Cognition; modeling; constraint network; Adjudication Cut; predictive coding; Algorithmic Submersion; maintenance; inertia; cognitive immune system; consciousness; spirit; Ben-Shi sliding; MEER; Wisdom; Energy-Efficiency Theory
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hongpu Yang (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0e2b9154b0b828780af — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20073096
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Hongpu Yang
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...