Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Special and general relativity have established the core theoretical framework for modern spacetime physics,clarifying the regulatory effect of relative motion and gravitational potential on the proper time flow,which has been verified by numerous precision experiments.Nevertheless,with the improvement of optical atomic clock measurement accuracy to the 10⁻ ¹⁸order of magnitude,persistent systematic frequency drifts have been observed by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)and other global authoritative precision measurement institutions,which cannot be fully eliminated by relativistic corrections,environmental interference elimination and other existing physical means.There is no conclusive evidence in existing theories that spacetime geometry is the sole determinant of time flow. To interpret this unsolved experimental anomaly,this paper proposes the local time freedom hypothesis:the proper time of a physical system is not only dominated by relativistic spacetime geometric effects,but also affected by an independent covariant additional scaling effect ,which is determined by the coupling strength between the local system and the universal spacetime background and the locking degree of its internal recursive motion.This hypothesis is completely compatible with the core principles of relativity,and the superposition of the two effects does not break Lorentz covariance,causality and the integrity of spacetime.It provides a selfconsistent and falsifiable physical explanation for the systematic drift of highprecision atomic clocks,and puts forward implementable experimental verification schemes,providing a new research path for the in-depth exploration of the essential properties of spacetime and time.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
jingkai cheng
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
jingkai cheng (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b38a487c87a6a40d6d4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20186160