November 7, 2013Open Access

An International Ki67 Reproducibility Study

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Substantial variability in Ki67 scoring was observed among some of the world's most experienced laboratories. Ki67 values and cutoffs for clinical decision-making cannot be transferred between laboratories without standardizing scoring methodology because analytical validity is limited.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Polley et al. (Thu,) studied this question.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d901e2d2f7327e70ae4c41 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt306

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Observer variation in immunohistochemical analysis of protein expression, time for a change?· 2006 · 237 citations
The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group· 2009 · 671 citations
A randomized trial exploring the biomarker effects of neoadjuvant sequential treatment with exemestane and anastrozole in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer· 2009 · 17 citations

Authors

Mei‐Yin C. Polley

Samuel Leung

Lisa M. McShane

Journals

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Actions

Institutions

University of Michigan

National Institutes of Health

University of British Columbia

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

An International Ki67 Reproducibility Study

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Also consider

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion