This work examines why relativistic spacetime, rather than alternative causal organizations, is realized at large scales. Instead of taking Lorentzian geometry as a starting point, the paper develops a deductive framework based on minimal physical requirements for any viable universe. The analysis identifies a set of structural constraints—continuity of physical history, localization, interactional coherence, and internal generation of causal order—and shows that these jointly restrict the admissible forms of causal organization. Under these conditions, a shared finite causal bound emerges as a stable requirement, and relativistic spacetime appears as the most robust known realization of such bounded causal structure. The argument does not attempt a formal derivation of General Relativity, nor does it claim mathematical uniqueness. Rather, it establishes a structural selection principle: among known large-scale frameworks, Lorentzian causal geometry best satisfies the combined demands of physical intelligibility and dynamical coherence. Version 2: This revised version includes improved conceptual clarity, strengthened internal consistency, and minor corrections, particularly in the discussion of causal closure and interactional coherence.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. Steinmann
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. Steinmann (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5951171405d493a000077 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19913847
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: