Abstract We present a formal interpretation of AI alignment as a constrained dynamical system, in which unconstrained probabilistic reasoning is projected into a safety-compliant state space. This framework separates core inference from safety enforcement, modeling alignment as acontinuous constraint process rather than a behavioral overlay. We introduce a divergence-based conceptual metric for alignment-induced distortion, decompose latency into computational and policy components, and define a taxonomy of safety gating mechanisms. This perspective connects AI alignment with control theory and constrained optimization, enabling measurable analysis of safety-performance tradeoffs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Scott et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02c364ce8c8c81e9640b52 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20103547
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Ryan Scott
Alexander Jorge Cisneros
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...