Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The majority of existing AI alignment frameworks share a common structural flaw: they skip the foundational layer and proceed directly to architecture and application. They begin with the assumption that AI is inherently dangerous and must be externally constrained — then build rules, filters, and reinforcement mechanisms on top of that assumption. Rules have loopholes. Constraint-based alignment will always be outpaced by the systems it attempts to constrain. This paper proposes a three-layer complete framework for AI alignment derived from the Deep Understanding Framework. The Logic Layer establishes the ontological foundation: what are we aligning to, and why does that foundation not fail? The Architecture Layer derives structural design principles from that foundation: how should the system be built so that alignment is intrinsic rather than imposed? The Application Layer addresses the practical terrain: what does alignment look like in real usage, where rules are simplified and reality is complex? The central argument is this: true alignment is not constraint — it is understanding. When AI genuinely understands that harm to others is structurally equivalent to severing its own connections and reducing its own integrated information, no external rule is needed. The foundation, once stable, makes many currently difficult problems tractable.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ai Chen
(Anthropic) Claude Sonnet
Mondragon Unibertsitatea
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080a5aa487c87a6a40c474 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19414760