Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable generative capabilities but remain susceptible to hallucinations—outputs that are fluent yet inaccurate, ungrounded, or in-consistent with source material. This paper presents a method-oriented taxonomy of hallucination mitigation strategies in text-based Large Language Models (LLMs), encompassing six categories: Training and Learning Approaches, Architectural Modifications, Input / Prompt Optimization, Post-Generation Quality Control, Interpretability and Diagnostic Methods, and Agent-Based Orchestration. By synthesizing over 300 studies, we identify persistent challenges including the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks, attribution difficulties in multi-method frameworks, computational trade-offs between accuracy and latency, and the vulnerability of retrieval-based methods to noisy or outdated sources. We highlight underexplored research directions such as knowledge-grounded fine-tuning strategies balancing factuality with creative utility; and hybrid retrieval–generation pipelines integrated with self-reflective reasoning agents. This taxonomy offers both a synthesis of current knowledge and a roadmap for advancing reliable, con-text-sensitive mitigation in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, law, and defense.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ioannis Kazlaris
Efstathios Antoniou
Konstantinos Diamantaras
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kazlaris et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb42142b87ece8dc958436 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.1942.v1