Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are being used more and more in crucial areas like healthcare, finance, education, and criminal justice. While these systems can enhance efficiency and provide a level of objectivity, they often carry forward the biases that exist in their training data or the way they are designed. This paper delves into the different types and sources of bias found in AI systems, examines their societal and technical effects, and reviews the latest strategies for mitigating these issues. By looking at case studies and comparing fairness metrics and debiasing techniques, this work seeks to offer a thorough understanding of the fairness landscape in AI and highlight ways to foster responsible and equitable AI development. This survey study provides a clear and thorough look at fairness and bias in AI, diving into where these issues come from, how they affect us, and what we can do about them. We take a closer look at the various sources of bias, including data, algorithms, and human decisions, while also shining a light on the growing concern of generative AI bias, which can lead to the reinforcement of societal stereotypes. We evaluate how biased AI systems impact society, particularly in terms of perpetuating inequalities and promoting harmful stereotypes, especially as generative AI plays a bigger role in shaping content that affects public opinion. We discuss several proposed strategies for mitigating these biases, weigh the ethical implications of implementing them, and stress the importance of working together across different fields to make sure these strategies are effective. We also address the negative effects of AI bias on individuals and society, while providing an overview of current methods to tackle it, such as data pre-processing, model selection, and post-processing. We highlight the unique challenges posed by generative AI models and the necessity for strategies specifically designed to tackle these issues. Tackling bias in AI calls for a comprehensive approach that includes diverse and representative datasets, greater transparency and accountability in AI systems, and the exploration of alternative AI frameworks that prioritize fairness and ethical considerations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Archana Sharde
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Archana Sharde (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b35454b1d3bfb60e9e19 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.73195
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: