Analyzing Riders’ Behavioral Adaptation to Driving Patterns of Advanced Autonomous Vehicles: A Virtual Reality Simulation Study

The necessity of human supervision and intervention during autonomous driving has long been a topic of controversial discussion. From a developer's perspective, it is expected that users will readily adapt to well-calibrated autonomous driving systems (ADS) due to their superior performance in dynamic driving tasks (DDT) compared to conventional human-driven vehicles. However, when passengers experience an autonomous vehicle (AV), there may be an adjustment period during which they modify their behavior to accommodate the driving patterns of the ADS. Additionally, some passengers might not adapt to autonomous driving at all, highlighting potential limitations in the current ADS development strategy. This work studies the dynamics of human-automation interaction and introduces an "objective method", which employs a Virtual Reality (VR)-enabled simulation approach for in-depth behavioral analysis concerning riders' behavioral adaptation to autonomous driving. Specifically, we examined how participants interacted with and intervened in Level 4 ADS operating under conservative, moderate, and aggressive driving patterns in a fully autonomous environment. A realistic urban road network was recreated in VR, integrated with traffic microsimulation to generate various driving scenarios. Twenty-seven participants completed driving tasks across different AV modes, with their intervention behaviors analyzed in relation to traffic conditions and AV aggressiveness. Key findings include: (1) Participants showed higher intention to intervene but lower actual intervention rates under aggressive AV modes compared to moderate and conservative modes, suggesting quicker adaptation to more challenging driving scenarios. (2) Interventions generally proved unnecessary and sometimes detrimental to overall traffic performance in a full-AV environment. (3) Aggressive AV modes significantly improved traffic efficiency, with a 40% increase in average travel speed and a 53% reduction in waiting time. However, human interventions posed the greatest challenge to achieving optimal traffic conditions. This research provides insights into the complex dynamics of human-AV interaction and adaptation, offering valuable implications for AV interface design, implementation strategies, and public acceptance of autonomous driving technologies.