Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper examines the extent to which large language models (LLMs) have developed higher-order theory of mind (ToM); the human ability to reason about multiple mental and emotional states in a recursive manner (e.g. I think that you believe that she knows). This paper builds on prior work by introducing a handwritten test suite -- Multi-Order Theory of Mind Q&A -- and using it to compare the performance of five LLMs to a newly gathered adult human benchmark. We find that GPT-4 and Flan-PaLM reach adult-level and near adult-level performance on ToM tasks overall, and that GPT-4 exceeds adult performance on 6th order inferences. Our results suggest that there is an interplay between model size and finetuning for the realisation of ToM abilities, and that the best-performing LLMs have developed a generalised capacity for ToM. Given the role that higher-order ToM plays in a wide range of cooperative and competitive human behaviours, these findings have significant implications for user-facing LLM applications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Winnie Street
John Oliver Siy
Geoff Keeling
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Street et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67cc7b6db643587606e3f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.18870
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: