The fast adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the education sector has brought great changes in the learning environment by means of intelligent tutoring systems, automated grading, adaptive learning, and learning analytics. Although these innovations improve personalization, efficiency, and inclusivity, these inventions also produce ethical dilemmas of data privacy, bias in algorithms, transparency, accountability, and equity. This paper will examine the needs and perceptions of the stakeholders with a view to coming up with a responsible framework for applying AI ethically in educational institutions. A quantitative strategy was used in a descriptive manner and comprised 100 stakeholders purposely selected; this includes teachers, students, administrators, and developers. The data were gathered using a master structured questionnaire that covered the issues of AI literacy, perceived ethical risks, perceived relevance of ethical principles, and predicted institutional structures. The findings have shown that the participants have a fairly good conceptualization of AI (mean = 3.9) and are highly aware of the risks of ethics and especially on data privacy (4.2) and accountability (4.3). Respondents anticipated high moral values like fairness, inclusiveness, transparency, and safeguarding of personal data, and they stressed the essence of institutional rules, technical guidelines, training, and inter-stakeholder cooperation to guarantee the responsible use of AI. These results demonstrate the pressing need to develop a context-sensitive ethical AI model that can strike a balance between technological innovation and human values, thus encouraging trust, equity, and quality in learning and providing policymakers and practitioners with capacity building, institutional governance, and participatory approaches to responsible AI implementation in learning settings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mahesi Agni Zaus
Cici Andriani
Ilmiyati Rahmy Jasril
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zaus et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68f5fcdc8d54a28a75cf229a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025820