Background: Outcomes after critical illness vary markedly despite similar diagnoses and severity scores, underscoring the limitations of chronological age and conventional Intensive Care Unit (ICU) prognostic tools. Personalization of critical care is increasingly essential to improve not only short-term survival but also long-term post-discharge outcomes. Biological aging clocks provide a quantitative framework to capture physiological reserve, immune competence, and vulnerability to stress. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of original human studies published between January 2015 and October 2025 that evaluated biological aging biomarkers in adult ICU populations. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched, with backward citation screening. Results: Across epigenetic, telomere-based, cfDNA, proteomic, metabolomic, and phenotypic aging measures, accelerated biological aging was consistently associated with increased mortality, organ dysfunction, and post-ICU vulnerability. Despite substantial methodological heterogeneity, a convergent signal emerged linking inflammation-weighted and stress-responsive deep biological clocks to clinically meaningful outcomes in critically ill patients. Conclusions: Biological aging biomarkers represent a mechanistically grounded approach to personalized prognostication in critical care. From a translational perspective, deep biological clocks hold promise for personalized risk stratification, prognostication, and the identification of high-risk recovery phenotypes, although prospective validation and implementation studies are required.
Cheyne et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: