Abstract Background: Chemotherapy serves as the primary therapeutic approach for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), yet its efficacy remains unsatisfactory. Methods: This study was a single-arm, open-label, single-center clinical trial (NCT05447702) involving patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III TNBC at West China Hospital. The treatment regimen consisted of camrelizumab (200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks, 12 cycles), apatinib (250 mg orally daily), and alternating chemotherapy nab-paclitaxel (d1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks) for 4 cycles and epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (every 2 weeks) for 4 cycles. Results: From June 2023 to April 2024, 35 patients were enrolled, of whom 1 patient withdrew due to adverse reaction intolerance. At treatment completion, the total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is, ypN0) rate was 67.6% (23/34), and breast pCR (ypT0/is) rate was 70.6% (24/34). The overall response rate following neoadjuvant treatment reached 94.1% (32/34). Elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (38.2%) and aspartate aminotransferase (29.4%) were the most common grade 3-4 adverse events, with no significant toxicities or treatment-related deaths reported. Genomic analysis revealed a significantly higher TP53 mutation rate in the pCR group (80% vs. 55.6%, P0.05), while the non-pCR group exhibited a markedly elevated proportion of HRD-high patients (77.8% vs. 15.0%, P=0.01). Tumor microenvironment assessment confirmed reduced CD4+ T-cell infiltration (P=0.003) and enhanced fibroblast activation in non-pCR tumors. Comprehensive analysis of serum and tissue samples collected before and after neoadjuvant therapy via Olink and RNA sequencing revealed that the treatment induced a complex systemic immune response. These findings enabled the development of two novel scoring systems: a pretreatment response predictive score system for stratification and an efficacy assessment score system for treatment response evaluation. The PRPscore (baseline IL-18 + PD-L1 CPS) predicted pCR with an AUC of 0.823 (88% pCR rate in PRPscore-high group), while the EAscore (post-treatment IL-1α/IL-2/PTN/CXCL1/MMP7) evaluated therapeutic response with an AUC of 0.93 (exhibiting 100% non-pCR in EAscore-low group). The latter further implicated dysregulated IL-17 signaling as a potential therapeutic target. Conclusions: In conclusion, camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy have good clinical efficacy and good safety as neoadjuvant treatments for stage II-III TNBC, warranting further investigation and potential clinical application. This innovative dual-score system stratifies pretreatment prognosis (PRPscore) and dynamically evaluates therapeutic efficacy (EAscore), enabling precision neoadjuvant optimization. Citation Format: T. Luo, Z. Chunying, X. Liu, D. Zheng, Y. Cheng, Y. Song, P. He, X. Yan, X. Zhong, T. Tian, B. Wei, Y. Xie, J. Chen, Q. Lv. Exploratory phase II trial of camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with apatinib (a VEGFR-2 inhibitor) and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (NeoPanDa03): efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-08.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
T. Luo
Zhao Chunying
X. Liu
Clinical Cancer Research
Sichuan University
Jiangsu University
West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luo et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efd52 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd7-08
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: