Abstract Background: The ABC trials evaluated the efficacy of taxane with cyclophosphamide (TC) vs anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (AC-T) in patients (pts) with clinically high risk, HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC), and observed no significant difference between these treatment regimens among pts with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC. The MammaPrint® (MP), 70-gene signature, identifies pts with early BC (EBC) who derive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit. To examine the utility of MP in identifying pts likely to benefit from AC-T, we provide an updated analysis of data presented at ASCO 2024 and evaluated 3-year (yr) outcomes among propensity-score matched (PSM) pts with MP High Risk, HR+HER2- BC who received adjuvant TC or AC-T on the prospective observational FLEX Study. Methods: The FLEX Study (NCT03053193) enrolled EBC pts who received standard of care MP with BluePrint® (BP) intrinsic subtyping. 1261 pts had MP High Risk, BP Luminal B, HR+HER2- EBC and received either adjuvant TC or AC-T (non-randomized) with 3.2 yrs median follow-up. High Risk was further stratified into High Risk 1 (H1) and High Risk 2 (H2). PSM was performed to balance differences in age, tumor size and nodal status between the TC and AC-T-treated pts for the H1 and H2 groups, separately. The 3-yr invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), as defined by STEEP 2.0, was compared within H1 and H2 groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests, grouped by TC vs AC-T. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the effect of CT regimen and clinical features on survival within each group. Results: Among 1261 pts, 1107 had H1 and 154 had H2 HR+ HER2- BC. Pts who received TC (H1, n=818; H2, n=103) were PSM with pts who received AC-T (H1, n=289; H2, n=51), yielding a cohort of 578 pts with H1 and 102 with H2 BCs with no significant differences in clinical/pathologic features between the two CT groups within each of the H1 and H2 cohorts. For pts with H1 BC, no significant difference in 3-yr IDFS was observed between AC-T (95.6%) and TC (94.6%) treatment (p = 0.98; Table). In contrast, H2 pts treated with TC had a significantly worse IDFS of 89.3% compared with 100% for AC-T-treated pts, with an absolute benefit of 10.7% (p = 0.048). Multivariate Cox regression analysis within the H1 group showed no association with improved IDFS with AC-T, while the use of AC-T in H2 pts showed a trend towards improved IDFS compared to TC, but did not reach significance likely due to sample size. Conclusions: In this PSM analysis of non-randomized, real-world FLEX Study data with 3.2 yrs median follow-up, pts with H2 HR+HER2- EBC had significantly improved IDFS with AC-T compared to TC. In contrast, pts with H1 disease did not benefit more from AC-T vs TC. These findings further support the utility of MammaPrint in informing prognosis and CT selection in pts with HR+HER2- EBC. Citation Format: J. O'Shaughnessy, A. Brufsky, C. L. Graham, C. R. Osborne, R. L. Rahman, A. Elkhanany, E. A. Brown, L. P. Gold, N. M. Johnson, D. Giffoni, J. Alberty-Oller, R. L. Mahtani, H. Ramaswamy, N. Stivers, A. Menicucci, W. Audeh. Improved 3-year IDFS with anthracycline-based therapy for patients with 70-gene signature High 2, Luminal B, HR+HER2- early-stage breast cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-07-03.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
J. A. O'Shaughnessy
A Brufsky
C. L. Graham
Clinical Cancer Research
University of Pittsburgh
Texas Tech University
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
O'Shaughnessy et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8d4ecb39a600b3eff9a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-07-03