Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments

Lo et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56f8a75589c71d767d99d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-45

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1. XI Cochrane Colloquium: Evidence Health Care and Culture· 2003 · 12 citations
2. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group· 2004 · 315 citations
3. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses· 2014 · 17,872 citations
4. An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods· 2004 · 213 citations
5. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data· 1977 · 78,098 citations