Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Several multiple imputation techniques are described for simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse on a scalar outcome variable. The methods are compared using both analytic and Monte Carlo results concerning coverages of the resulting intervals for the population mean. Using m = 2 imputations per missing value gives accurate coverages in common cases and is clearly superior to single imputation (m = 1) in all cases. The performances of the methods for various m can be predicted well by linear interpolation in 1/(m — 1) between the results for m = 2 and m = ∞. As a rough guide, to assure coverages of interval estimates within 2% of the nominal level when using the preferred methods, the number of imputations per missing value should increase from 2 to 3 as the nonresponse rate increases from 10% to 60%.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rubin et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d720f18a0e2c5879bef52c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478280
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Donald B. Rubin
Nathaniel Schenker
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Harvard University
United States Census Bureau
Statistical Research (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...