MCF-7 and HepG2 cancer cell lines, and EGFR (1M17) and VEGFR2 (3VHE) targets
Quinoline-pyrazole hybrid derivatives (specifically compound 4e)
Doxorubicin (for cytotoxicity), erlotinib and sorafenib (for molecular docking)
Cytotoxicity (IC50 values) and binding affinitysurrogate
Quinoline-pyrazole hybrids, particularly compound 4e, show promise as dual EGFR/VEGFR2 inhibitors for anticancer drug development.
ABSTRACT A series of novel quinoline‐pyrazole hybrid derivatives (4a–j) were synthesized via a rapid, eco‐friendly one‐pot three‐component condensation using TiO 2 nanoparticles as catalysts. The reaction proceeded efficiently at room temperature in methanol, yielding products within 5–10 min. All compounds were evaluated for cytotoxicity against MCF‐7 and HepG2 cancer cell lines using the MTT assay. Compound 4e (4‐OCH₃) exhibited the most potent activity, with IC 50 values of 9.1 ± 0.5 μM (MCF‐7) and 24.2 ± 0.7 μM (HepG2), comparable to doxorubicin (10.6 ± 0.2 μM for MCF‐7). Structure–activity relationship analysis revealed that electron‐donating groups (4‐OCH 3 , 3‐OCH 3 , and 4‐CH 3 ). Molecular docking studies against EGFR (1 M17) and VEGFR2 (3VHE) showed that 4e exhibited superior binding affinity (−6.34 and −7.51 kcal/mol) compared with erlotinib and sorafenib, with key hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions in the ATP‐binding sites. These findings establish quinoline‐pyrazole hybrids as promising dual EGFR/VEGFR2 inhibitors, with compound 4e being a lead candidate for anticancer drug development.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dharmesh Katariya
Jay B. Maheta
Caterina Gori
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
Saurashtra University
RK University
Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Katariya et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893a86c1944d70ce04a2a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.70190
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: