Nurse practitioner-led care showed no difference in quality of life compared to usual cardiologist care, but yielded higher patient satisfaction (CSQ score 76.32 vs 65.75, p=0.0006).
RCT
Does nurse practitioner-led care improve quality of life in adult patients with atrial fibrillation compared to usual cardiologist care?
150 adult patients with atrial fibrillation referred to a specialized cardiac clinic, mean age 64 years, 62% male.
Nurse practitioner (NP)-led care for 6 months
Usual cardiologist care for 6 months
Difference in change in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) scores at 6 months between groupspatient reported
Nurse practitioner-led care for atrial fibrillation provides similar quality of life and clinical outcomes as usual cardiologist care, while significantly improving patient satisfaction.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare resource utilization.Health system limitations can result in delays to specialty cardiovascular (CV) care.Nurse practitioner (NP)-led care may improve access and quality of care.The purpose of this study was to assess effect of NP-led care compared to usual cardiologist care on quality of life in patients with AF.Methods: Patients with AF referred to a specialized cardiac clinic were randomized to NP-led or usual cardiologist care for 6 months.Primary outcome was difference in change in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) scores at 6 months between groups.Secondary outcomes were difference in change of EuroQOL EQ-5D-3L scores at 6 months between groups, composite outcome of death from CV causes, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and patient satisfaction measured by the Consultant Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) at six months. Results:We enrolled 150 subjects, with 10% loss to follow up.Study subjects were 62% male, mean age 64 years, overall AFEQT baseline score 66.45+4:86.There were no significant baseline differences between groups.AFEQT scores, EQ-5D-3L and CV outcomes were not different at 6 months, NP-led care showed higher patient satisfaction in the CSQ domain of professional care (76.32 +11.32 vs 65.75+15.45,p=0.0006). Conclusion:We found no difference in quality of life or CV outcomes at 6 months with NP-led care vs usual cardiologist care.NP-led care resulted in higher patient satisfaction.Further research is needed to explore the effect of NP-led AF care in CV settings Clinical Trial Registration NCT02745236
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Smigorowsky et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Atrial Fibrillation (n=150). Nurse practitioner-led care vs. Usual cardiologist care was evaluated on Difference in change in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) scores at 6 months between groups. Nurse practitioner-led care showed no difference in quality of life compared to usual cardiologist care, but yielded higher patient satisfaction (CSQ score 76.32 vs 65.75, p=0.0006).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895d86c1944d70ce06fa1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2026.03.018
Marcie J. Smigorowsky
Ross T. Tsuyuki
CJC Open
University of Alberta
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...