Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) raises profound questions regarding theological relevance within contemporary “theo-tech” debates. A prevailing tendency in addressing these questions is to frame theological engagement through a “God of the gaps” strategy. However, such an approach renders theological relevance increasingly fragile in the face of rapid scientific progress. By employing a conceptual interdisciplinary method – engaging AI advances across cognitive, biomedical, and climate sciences while centering Biblical and Qur’anic theology – this study argues that AI does not replace theology. Instead, it expands theology’s interpretive role, opening new inquiries that exceed the limits of empirical science. The findings indicate that gap-based theology falters when cast as a rival to scientific explanation. In response, this study proposes a shift from the traditional “God of the gaps” strategy to a “gateway-oriented” model, capable of addressing the ethical, anthropological, and existential challenges posed by AI. Ultimately, the preliminary application of gateway-oriented theology confirms its ability to engage with AI challenges while sustaining long-term theological relevance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zia Ul Haq
Open Theology
University of Sharjah
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zia Ul Haq (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc88b93afacbeac03ea87b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2025-0067
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: