The high-speed and high-Reynolds-number conditions encountered in actual flight, coupled with the performance requirements for both low-speed climb and high-speed cruise, pose challenges for boundary-layer transition prediction and optimization in laminar design. Consequently, there are still relatively few mature and applicable high-speed laminar airfoils available. To address the insufficient validation of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models under actual high-speed and high-Reynolds-number (Re > 107) flight conditions, the practical fidelity of the most commonly used γ−R~eθt transition model as well as NASA CFL3D solver is systematically assessed based on NASA HSNLF(1)-0213 and Honda SHM-1 high-speed business jet laminar airfoils. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, since there is no available geometry data for the SHM-1 airfoil, this is the first systematic analysis of this airfoil from a perspective other than the design team. Results demonstrate that the γ−R~eθt transition model could accurately capture natural transition and separation-induced transition at Reynolds numbers up to 16.2 × 106, while also exhibiting strong robustness against variations in Mach and Reynolds number. Using the HSNLF(1)-0213 as the baseline airfoil and the design conditions of SHM-1, a multi-objective drag-reduction optimization considering climb and cruise performance was then conducted based on the Isight platform. The optimal airfoil achieves 9.53% climb drag reduction and 9.21% cruise drag reduction, revealing that aft-loading and strong favorable pressure gradients are essential to balance lift characteristics and sustain extensive laminar flow at high Reynolds numbers.
Du et al. (Mon,) studied this question.