As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly autonomous, scalable, and embedded in critical digital infrastructure, AI safety has emerged as a significant consideration for cybersecurity, system reliability, and institutional trust. Advances in large language models and agentic systems expand the threat surface to include misalignment, large-scale misuse, opaque decision-making, and cross-border risk propagation, while existing debates remain fragmented across technical, ethical, and geopolitical domains. This paper conducts a structured comparative analysis of AI safety perspectives from ten influential thinkers, examining them across five dimensions and reframing their insights through a cybersecurity lens spanning national governance, industry standards, and firm-level design. Building on this synthesis, the study proposes a layered control architecture that organizes technical safeguards, governance mechanisms, and human oversight into a defense-in-depth structure. The framework is conceptual and theory-building, intended to clarify system-level security reasoning and support future empirical refinement across diverse institutional contexts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Choi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866f16e0dea528ddeb390 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040447
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Young B. Choi
Paul Hong
Young Soo Park
Systems
University of Toledo
Regent University
Midwest University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...