Abstract The interplay between humans and artificial intelligence (AI) in decision-making has become increasingly intricate and significant. Despite rapid advancements, the literature remains fragmented, with limited integrative frameworks to explain how AI-human dynamics and decision-making typologies shape outcomes. This study addresses this critical gap by conducting a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 1,004 articles, culminating in a novel conceptual framework. The framework identifies two critical dimensions, AI-human dynamics and decision typologies, that shape decision outcomes and introduces four distinct paradigms of AI-human collaborative decision-making: autonomous execution, guided resolution, collaborative exploration, and augmented discovery. By synthesizing these paradigms, this research advances the theoretical understanding of hybrid decision-making systems and provides actionable insights for organizations navigating complex and AI-driven environments. By elucidating the mechanisms and trade-offs inherent in AI-human collaboration, this work lays a robust foundation for future research on adaptive decision systems in an era marked by accelerating technological change.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4322ad7bf08b1ead1cca — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6885768/v1
Han Li
Feng Tian
University of Newcastle Australia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...