Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose of the study: This research study aims to determine the effect of PhET simulation on the learning motivation of grade 12 STEM students in physics, specifically in projectile motion. Methodology: This study employed a quasi-experimental research design. A convenience sampling technique was utilized with a sample size of thirty-three (n=33) senior high school Grade 12 STEM students from a private institution in Malolos, Bulacan. The quantitative data of this research was obtained through the Students Motivation Toward Physics Learning Questionnaire (SMTPLQ) and a semi-structured interview with random students. The data was analyzed using average mean, p-value, and paired-samples t-test using SPSS 22 software. Main Findings: The learning motivation of the students in physics before the implementation of the PhET simulation was 3.82 (76.4%), which was medium-level motivation. After the implementation of the PhET simulation, the student's motivation in physics was 3.85 (77%), suggesting there was no statistically significant effect after using the PhET simulation. Despite no significant impact on motivation, students appreciated the engaging interaction with PhET simulations. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research introduces a novel approach by integrating PhET simulations to enhance student learning motivation in physics. By leveraging interactive and engaging virtual experiments, this study aims to foster a deeper understanding and interest in physics concepts among students. Using PhET simulations offers a dynamic learning environment that encourages active participation and exploration, revitalizing traditional teaching methods.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ernesto F. Manlapig
Schrödinger Journal of Physics Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ernesto F. Manlapig (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e57d2fb6db64358751bd39 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i3.1025
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: