We present a rigid mathematical framework in which 27 independent Standard Model quantities—the gauge group, three coupling constants, three generations, eight fermion mass ratios, six mixing angles, two CP phases, the strong CP angle, the Higgs-to-\ (W\) mass ratio, the \ (Z\) -to-electron mass ratio, the electron-to-Planck mass ratio, one neutrino mass, and \ (₍\) —are determined by a single integer \ (a₁ = 5\), the unique solution of \ (a₁! = 4\, a₁ (a₁+1) \). The framework has no adjustable parameters beyond the electron mass \ (mₑ\) (a dimensional anchor): falsification of any single prediction invalidates the entire structure. From \ (a₁\) we derive \ (= (1+5) /2\) (golden ratio), the 600-cell (\ (a₁! = 120\) vertices), and \ (E₈\) (\ (h = a₁ (a₁+1) = 30\) ). We prove \ (N₆₄₍ = 3\) via Galois invariance and derive all nine fermion mass exponents through Galois conjugation and Casimir eigenvalues. The CKM correction coefficients are ratios of \ (E₈\) Dynkin leg dimensions; the CP phase \ (₂₊₌ = (5) \) (0. 77%) is the Galois angle of \ (\) ; the strong CP problem is resolved by Galois invariance (\ (ₐ₂₃ = 0\) ). PMNS mixing angles follow from a Galois mixing matrix on \ (A₅\) irreps with eigenvalues \ (\0, N₆₄₍, a₁\\) and tribimaximal eigenvectors; \ (A₅\) Clebsch–Gordan corrections give all three angles to < 0. 4%. Key Predictions Quantity Formula Error Status \ (^-1\) (fine structure) \ (2 x² - 4a₁⁴ x + 1 = 0\) 0. 0001% Derived \ (ₛ\) (strong coupling) \ (1/ (2³) \) 0. 11% Derived \ (²W\) \ (b₁/ (a₁²+1) = 6/26\) 0. 19% Derived \ (mH/mW\) \ (- 8\) 0. 09% Derived Gauge group \ (SU (3) SU (2) U (1) \) from \ (A₅\) McKay Exact Derived \ (N₆₄₍\) \ (3\) (Nyquist on icosahedron) Exact Derived Fermion masses (bare) \ (mₑ ^5a+6b\) 3–21% Derived Fermion masses (corrected) Holonomy corrections per sector 4. 4% RMS Alg. motivated CKM angles (all 3) \ ( (^-n (1+c) ) \) < 0. 2% Derived PMNS \ (²₂₃\) \ (4/7\) (\ (A₅\) Clebsch–Gordan) 0. 32% Derived PMNS \ (²₁₂\) \ (2/ (+a₁) \) (TBM + Galois) 0. 26% Derived PMNS \ (²₁₃\) \ (1/ (a₁ N₄₈₆) = 1/45\) 0. 87% Derived \ (₂₊₌\) \ ( (5) \) 0. 77% Derived \ (₌₍ₒ\) \ (3 (5) \) 0. 36% Derived \ (mₑ/mP\) \ (^4²\) 0. 24% Derived \ (mZ/mₑ\) \ (^25 (mZ) / (0) \) 0. 09% Derived (+running) Jarlskog \ (J\) \ (3. 12 10^-5\) 1. 1% Derived \ (ₐ₂₃\) \ (0\) (Galois invariance) Exact Derived Dark sector Galois conjugation \ (-1/\) — Derived \ (P\) (cosm. const. ) \ (^ (N-N₆₄₍) /2 - \) 0. 33% Pattern The Galois conjugation \ (' = -1/\) generates a dark sector: all coupling constants become complex or negative, yielding 9 stable, electromagnetically dark particles interacting only gravitationally—a dark matter candidate with zero additional parameters. The cosmological constant matches \ (P = ^ (N - N₆₄₍) /2 - \) to 0. 13\ (\) (0. 33%). Falsifiable Predictions (Testable by 2030) \ (²₁₃ = 1/45 = 0. 02222\) — JUNO, < 0. 5% precision expected \ (m_ = 0. 058\) eV — EUCLID/DESI, sensitivity ~0. 02 eV \ (₌₍ₒ = 197. 7^\) — Hyper-K/DUNE, ±10° \ (mH/mW = - 8 = 1. 559\) — HL-LHC, ±0. 1% Any single miss falsifies the entire framework. Honest Limitations Holonomy correction sector assignments are algebraically motivated, not derived from a single principle (Proposition 7: no-go for static geometry) Cosmological constant formula is a strong pattern without a spectral action mechanism Dark matter abundance ratio \ (₃₌/b = 7 - \) is speculative Electron mass \ (mₑ\) remains one free dimensional parameter Yukawa edge weights on the McKay graph (8 parameters) remain open Reproducible code: github. com/razvananghelina/One-Integer-Three-Generations — five self-contained Python scripts verifying coupling constants, 600-cell spectrum, fermion masses, Berry phase, and spectral action.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Razvan Constantin Anghelina
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Razvan Constantin Anghelina (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69926552eb1f82dc367a1256 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18644374
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: