Abstract Background: The 70-gene signature (MammaPrint®) predicts distant metastasis risk in early invasive breast cancer, especially HR+/HER2- patients with 0-3 nodes. Despite guideline inclusion, its performance in Chinese populations needs validation. This study compares clinicopathological features between a Chinese cohort and MINDACT. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1900 Chinese early breast cancer patients tested with MammaPrint®. Clinical risk (C-High C-H or C-Low C-L) used modified Adjuvant! Online. Genomic risk (MammaPrint®): High Risk (G-H) or Low Risk (G-L), subcategorized by quartile (Ultra-Low G-UL, Low but Not Ultra-Low G-LNUL, High but Not Ultra-High G-H1, Ultra-High G-H2). Compared G-H vs G-L within Chinese cohort, and key characteristics (age, T-stage, grade, nodal status) across overall population and four risk groups (C-H/G-H, C-H/G-L, C-L/G-H, C-L/G-L) with MINDACT (n=6693). Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, with statistical significance defined as a two-sided P 0.05. Results: Within the Chinese Cohort (G-H vs. G-L): Of 1,900 patients, 1,120 (58.9%) were G-L and 780 (41.1%) were G-H (distribution: G-UL 11.0%, G-LNUL 48.0%, G-H1 38.0%, G-H2 3.0%). Significant differences (p 0.001) included:T-stage: G-L: T1 60.4%, T2 38.0%; G-H: T1 51.0%, T2 46.7%,Grade: G-L: G1 16.9%, G2 79.2%, G3 3.9%; G-H: G1 7.3%, G2 71.3%, G3 21.4%,PR Ki67 ≤14%: 48.8% (G-L) vs. 16.9% (G-H); Ki67 14%: 51.2% (G-L) vs. 83.1% (G-H). Chinese Cohort vs. MINDACT (Overall 50 years: 40.3% vs. 33.3%, p 0.001), had higher T2 stage (41.6% vs. 27.2%, p 0.001), higher Grade 2 frequency (75.9% vs. 49.1%, p 0.001), and slightly higher node positivity (23.7% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.013). Group-specific differences (p 0.001) included:C-H/G-L: Higher Grade 2 (86.8% vs. 64.2%), higher T2 (69.1% vs. 54.4%), lower T1 (27.2% vs. 41.8%)C-H/G-H: Higher T2 (67.7% vs. 46.7%), predominant Grade 2 (60.1% vs. 23.3%), lower Grade 3 (37.5% vs. 75.6%)C-L/G-H: Younger age (50 years: 49.9% vs. 30.1%), minimal advanced disease (T3: 0%; G3: 2.5%)C-L/G-L: Younger age (50 years: 45.9% vs. 29.1%); predominantly T1, Grade 2, node-negative tumorsClinical-genomic discordance (C-H/G-L) was 24.0% in China, consistent with MINDACT (23.0%); overall concordance was 57.1%. Conclusion: Significant differences exist between Chinese and MINDACT cohorts in age (younger), T-stage (higher T2), and grade (higher Grade 2), persisting across MammaPrint® risk subgroups. These findings underscore the necessity of validating the 70-gene signature’s predictive value for chemotherapy decisions using China-specific data. Survival analysis of this large cohort and prospective studies will further evaluate its risk stratification performance and clinical utility in Chinese early breast cancer patients. Citation Format: H. Liu, G. Liu, W. Zhou, N. Li, Y. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Sheng, D. Zhou, C. Wang, G. Liu. Clinical Characteristics of Chinese Patients with Early Invasive Breast Cancer Tested with 70-gene signature: Comparison with the MINDACT Cohort abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-07-25.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
H. Liu
G. Liu
W. Zhou
Clinical Cancer Research
Second Military Medical University
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9ded482488d673cd42eb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-07-25