In 2017, the Netherlands introduced primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening with cytology triage, which increased colposcopy referrals and low-grade lesions detected. In 2022, HPV16/18 genotyping was added for women with borderline/low-grade cytology. Triage with HPV genotyping may better balance screening benefits, harms, and costs. Therefore, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 19 triage strategies based on net monetary benefit (NMB) at cost-effectiveness thresholds of €20,000 and €50,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with the highest NMB indicating the most cost-effective strategy. Triage tests included 16/18 genotyping, 7-type (16/18/31/33/45/52/58) genotyping, and cytology (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions HSIL: moderate/severe, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance ASC-US/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions LSIL: borderline/low-grade, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy NILM: normal). Effects on cancer incidence and mortality were obtained by combining POBASCAM trial data with nationwide screening and cancer registries. Time since the onset of high-grade lesion (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 CIN2/3) at baseline of the Population-based Screening Study Amsterdam trial cannot be estimated from the data and was varied between 0 and 10 years. At a €20,000/QALY threshold, immediate referral for HSIL and 16/18-positive ASC-US/LSIL, and repeat cytology for 16/18-negative ASC-US/LSIL and 7-types positive NILM had the highest NMB (€214.1 to €309.3/woman gained compared to referring all HPV-positive women). At a €50,000/QALY threshold, immediate referral for all 16/18-positives and/or HSIL, and repeat cytology for 16/18-negative ASC-US/LSIL and 7-types positive NILM had the highest NMB if time since onset of CIN2/3 was greater than 2 years. Cytology combined with HPV16/18 and extended genotyping is cost-effective for triage of HPV-positives. Immediate colposcopy referral of all HPV16/18-positives is cost-effective at a €50,000/QALY threshold.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kelsi R. Kroon
Johannes A. Bogaards
Johannes Berkhof
International Journal of Cancer
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Cancer Center Amsterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kroon et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75c2bc6e9836116a24be2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70344