Background: In India, most women know about contraception, but many still do not use it. This results in a large unmet need for family planning. Knowing the local reasons helps plan better interventions. Objectives: 1. To assess the prevalence of contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age. 2.To identify determinants and barriers contributing to unmet contraceptive need. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was done for six months in the field practice area of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Tamil Nadu. Using systematic random sampling, 360 married women aged 15–49 years were included. Information was collected using a pretested structured proforma. Results: The mean age of participants was 24.34 ± 3.69 years. Most women were aware of contraception (78.1%), but only a smaller proportion were currently using it (28.3%). The main reasons for use were financial reasons (98.0%) and spacing between pregnancies (98.0%). The common barriers were feeling that contraception was “not important” (50.4%) and family influence (44.2%). Socioeconomic status was significantly related to contraceptive use (p=0.007). After adjustment, women from the upper middle class were less likely to use contraception (AOR 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08–0.81), while graduates were more likely to use contraception (AOR 3.64; 95% CI: 1.53–8.68). Conclusion: There is a clear difference between knowing about contraception and actually using it. Education and socioeconomic status strongly affect contraceptive use. Family-based counseling and locally suitable behavior-change interventions are needed to reduce unmet need.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. Selvaraj
T Vetriselvan
S. Dhamodharan
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Selvaraj et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a760d2c6e9836116a2dede — DOI: https://doi.org/10.61770/nbejms.2026.v04.i02.005