This paper presents a unified framework for consciousness built from two lines of reasoning that achieve consilience on a single specification for conscious substrates. The empirical line — drawing on a formal thought experiment (the Discrete Gate Construction), the neuroscience of traumatic dissociation, and cross-species data on self-model complexity — yields a vehicle specification: consciousness requires a physical substrate characterized by temporal continuity, sufficient interior complexity, and a self-model. The physical line — grounded in the informational asymmetry between the total information content of reality and the finite capacity of any local region, as established by the Bekenstein bound — shows that bounded physical apertures are a necessary feature of any reality in which local experience occurs, and that the structural requirements of such apertures correspond to the empirically derived specification. The framework proposes a type-identity between experience and structured partiality through a bounded aperture, suggesting that the hard problem of consciousness may rest on a false premise. Testable predictions are offered, including novel predictions about the neural signatures of volitional versus traumatic dissociation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
mitch hart
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
mitch hart (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c229bdaeb5a845df0d4b8c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19165479
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: