Does a 23-protein biomarker panel improve risk prediction for major CVDs in cancer survivors compared to traditional CVD risk scores?
4,225 cancer survivors (aged 37-73 years) from the UK Biobank without a diagnosis of major CVDs at recruitment, with available plasma proteomic data.
23-protein biomarker panel derived from plasma proteomic profiling
Traditional CVD risk scores (SCORE2/SCORE2-OP, FRS, PCE, QRISK3)
Major CVDs (composite of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, angina, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke)composite
A novel 23-protein panel significantly improves the prediction and reclassification of major cardiovascular disease risk in cancer survivors compared to traditional risk scores.
Background: The classic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores perform poorly in predicting CVD in cancer survivors. This study aimed to identify proteins associated with major CVDs risk and explore their roles in risk prediction for major CVDs in cancer survivors. Methods: We included 4225 cancer survivors from the UK Biobank with available plasma proteomic data and no major CVDs at recruitment. Associations between proteins and risks of major CVDs (heart failure, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, angina, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, followed by enrichment analysis. Candidate protein biomarkers were further identified through random forest model, and classification performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI). Results: This study identified 182 proteins, the majority of which were positively associated with major CVDs risk in cancer survivors (HRs:1.11-1.93), especially NTproBNP, NPC2, TNFRSF12A, LMNB2, and EDA2R, mainly involved in biological processes of immune, inflammatory, and angiogenesis. Further, a panel of 23 proteins derived from a random forest model demonstrated moderate predictive performance for major, 5-year, and 10-year CVDs in the test set (AUCs: 0.646–0.665), outperforming several classic CVD risk scores. Incorporating the protein panel into CVD risk scores significantly improved discrimination (AUCs: 0.647–0.705) and 5-year risk reclassification (NRI: 0.245–0.327; IDI: 0.055–0.060). Conclusions: Certain plasma proteins were associated with major CVD risk and may serve as promising biomarkers for risk prediction in cancer survivors, but these require further investigation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ce6c1944d70ce05c8d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01570-1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Peng Wang
Yu Peng
Fubin Liu
Communications Medicine
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...