Study on the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Between Humans and Large Language Models Based on Human–Machine Identity Characteristics

Employing a 4 (opponent type) × 2 (communication condition) between-subjects design, the study recruited 194 valid human participants to complete three rounds of game tasks. Results revealed: (1) The type of game counterpart exerted a significant main effect on participants’ remaining funds (F(3, 185) = 3.179, p = 0.025). Human participants retained significantly more funds when the counterpart was a real large model compared to other groups. (2) A significant interaction existed between the type of game counterpart and communication conditions (F(3, 185) = 3.318, p = 0.021). Specifically, when the opponent was a fake AI model (presented as human but actually an AI), human participants’ remaining funds were significantly higher under the communication condition than without communication (p = 0.012). This indicates that communication can promote rational decision-making in identity mismatch scenarios by providing additional behavioral cues. In the fake-human group (informed as human but actually AI), a numerical trend toward increased funds was also observed under communication conditions, though it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.159); (3) The moderating effect of social value orientation did not reach significance. These findings extend the application of the theory of mind in human–machine games, revealing the complex influence mechanism of identity perception and communication dynamics on rational decision-making.