Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
As AI-powered systems increasingly mediate consequential decision-making, their explainability is critical for end-users to take informed and accountable actions. Explanations in human-human interactions are socially-situated. AI systems are often socio-organizationally embedded. However, Explainable AI (XAI) approaches have been predominantly algorithm-centered. We take a developmental step towards socially-situated XAI by introducing and exploring Social Transparency (ST), a sociotechnically informed perspective that incorporates the socio-organizational context into explaining AI-mediated decision-making. To explore ST conceptually, we conducted interviews with 29 AI users and practitioners grounded in a speculative design scenario. We suggested constitutive design elements of ST and developed a conceptual framework to unpack ST’s effect and implications at the technical, decision-making, and organizational level. The framework showcases how ST can potentially calibrate trust in AI, improve decision-making, facilitate organizational collective actions, and cultivate holistic explainability. Our work contributes to the discourse of Human-Centered XAI by expanding the design space of XAI.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Upol Ehsan
Q. Vera Liao
Michael Müller
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta Technical College
The NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ehsan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69de4f001c2d3320f8b0bf84 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445188
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: