Beyond Clinical Skills: What Shapes Job Performance Among ICU Respiratory Therapists?

Background: Intensive care units (ICUs) are high-acuity environments that require respiratory therapists (RTs) to maintain vigilance, manage emotions, and make rapid clinical decisions. In such settings, performance stability is critical for patient safety. Although emotional intelligence (EI) and work–life balance (WLB) have been linked to professional outcomes in health care, their independent and direction-specific associations with job performance among ICU respiratory therapists remain underexamined. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted among respiratory therapists working in ICUs across Saudi Arabia (June 2025–January 2026). EI was measured using the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale. WLB was assessed using the work interference with personal life (WIPL), personal life interference with work (PLIW), and work–personal life enhancement (WPLE) scales. Job performance was evaluated using the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Correlation and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to estimate independent associations. Results: A total of 392 RTs were included in the final analysis. Higher EI was independently associated with greater task performance (B = 0.21, p < 0.01) and contextual performance (B = 0.30, p < 0.001), and with lower counterproductive work behaviours (B = −0.24, p < 0.001). Among WLB dimensions, PLIW showed the strongest adverse association, predicting lower task performance (B = −0.20, p < 0.05) and higher counterproductive behaviours (B = 0.39, p < 0.001), but was not significantly associated with contextual performance in the fully adjusted model. WPLE demonstrated modest positive associations with performance, whereas WIPL was not significant in adjusted models. Conclusions: Job performance among ICU respiratory therapists is shaped by both emotional regulatory capacity and cross-domain strain. Personal life interference with work emerged as the most influential adverse predictor, whereas EI was associated with constructive performance patterns. Findings should be interpreted in light of the cross-sectional design and self-reported data. Sustaining performance in high-acuity settings requires attention to emotional competencies and structural sources of role conflict alongside clinical expertise. These findings inform workforce strategies to support performance and sustainability in critical care settings.