Repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation during ICD implantation significantly impaired diastolic filling (E/A ratio decreased from 2.6 to 1.6, P<0.01).
Observational
Do repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation impair left ventricular systolic function and diastolic filling in patients undergoing cardioverter-defibrillator implantation?
12 patients undergoing non-thoracotomy implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator
Repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation (≥ 4 episodes) during threshold testing
Baseline (before repeated threshold tests)
Systolic function (fractional area change) and diastolic filling (E/A ratio) assessed peri-operatively on a beat-by-beat basis using transoesophageal echo-Dopplersurrogate
Repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation during ICD implantation cause significant impairment in diastolic filling without affecting systolic function.
BACKGROUND: Investigators studying the effects of cardioverter-defibrillators on left ventricular systolic function have given only minor attention to the diastolic effects. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation on systolic function and diastolic filling of the left ventricle during non-thoracotomy implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. METHODS: Systolic function and diastolic filling of the left ventricle were assessed peri-operatively on a beat-by-beat basis using a transoesophageal echo-Doppler technique in 12 patients during > or = 4 episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation. Systolic function was assessed from the fractional area change and diastolic filling from the E/A ratio. Arterial blood pressure and the ECG were recorded continuously. RESULTS: Blood pressure and heart rate did not change significantly throughout the procedure. The systolic function, similarly, was not significantly affected; the only changes were seen in the first two beats after defibrillation when the mean fractional area increased from 0.2 +/- 0.01 to 0.4 +/- 0.02 and 0.3 +/- 0.02, respectively (P < 0.001). Diastolic filling was, however, impaired as reflected by a decrease in the E/A ratio from 2.6 +/- 0.5 before to 1.6 +/- 0.4 (P < 0.01) after repeated threshold tests. CONCLUSIONS: While the combined ischaemic and electrical trauma caused by repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation during the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator did not cause any systolic dysfunction, diastolic filling was significantly impaired.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mikael Runsiö
Lennart Bergfeldt
L.‐Å. Brodin
European Heart Journal
Karolinska Institutet
Karolinska University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Runsiö et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Patients undergoing non-thoracotomy implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (n=12). Repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation vs. Baseline (before repeated threshold tests) was evaluated on Systolic function (fractional area change) and diastolic filling (E/A ratio) (p=<0.01). Repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation during ICD implantation significantly impaired diastolic filling (E/A ratio decreased from 2.6 to 1.6, P<0.01).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ea386ac2ceeb8fbfae7e8b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015093