Digital retail is undergoing a paradigm shift driven by the deep integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and augmented reality (AR). Although prior studies have examined the independent effects of AI-based personalized recommendation (cognitive path) and AR-enabled immersion (experiential path), how their integration systematically shapes user behavior through internal psychological mechanisms remains an important unresolved theoretical gap. To address this gap, this study develops an integrated model grounded in the stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) framework and trust transfer theory. Specifically, the model examines how personalized recommendation, as a dynamic external stimulus, influences users’ cognitive state (perceived usefulness) and experiential state (immersion); how the overall trust of users in the integrated platform can be used as a key boundary condition to adjust the transformation efficiency from the above stimulus to the internal state; and how the above cognitive and experiential states can ultimately drive the continued usage intention through the mediation of positive emotional response. Based on survey data from 400 Chinese consumers with AR shopping experience on Taobao, analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), the results indicate that (1) personalized recommendation positively affects both immersion and perceived usefulness; (2) platform trust significantly and positively moderates the effects of personalized recommendation on both immersion and perceived usefulness; (3) both cognitive and experiential states stimulate positive emotions, which in turn enhance continued usage intention, with perceived usefulness exerting a stronger effect; (4) a key theoretical finding is that there is a significant positive correlation between perceived usefulness and immersion, revealing the coupling of psychological paths in an integrated environment; however, immersion does not moderate the effect of personalized recommendation on emotional responses, suggesting that the current integration mode emphasizes the formation of a stable psychological structure rather than real-time interaction. This study makes three contributions to the existing literature. First, it extends the application of S–O–R theory in a complex technological environment by analyzing the “organism” as a parallel and related cognitive-experience dual path and confirming its coupling relationship. Second, it elucidates the enabling role of trust as a moderating mechanism rather than a direct antecedent, thereby enriching micro-level evidence for trust transfer theory in the context of technology integration. Finally, by contrasting path coupling with process regulation, this study provides a more detailed distinction for understanding the theoretical connotations and boundaries of AI–AR technology integration, which may mainly be a kind of structural integration.
Hu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.