Discordance between recommended and performed revascularization methods for left main stenosis led to higher short-term mortality, particularly in patients with SYNTAX > 22.
Does intuitive decision-making for PCI in left main stenosis that is discordant with ESC guidelines (SYNTAX > 22) affect short-term mortality compared to concordant treatment?
Performing PCI for left main coronary artery disease in discordance with ESC guidelines (SYNTAX score > 22) is associated with higher short-term mortality.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Introduction. When considering revascularization modalities, for patients with stable presentation, with appropriate coronary anatomy suitable for both PCI and CABG and low predicted surgical mortality, the recommendations are specifically focused on patients with main stem stenosis. In these cases, patients should be individually assessed according to the complexity of the anatomical disease, as determined by the anatomical SYNTAX score. In the last few years, the results of four randomized studies have been published comparing PCI with newer-generation DES and CABG in patients with left-main stenosis. The latest 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes recommend CABG over PCI when the anatomical SYNTAX score exceeds 22, as indicated by recent trials. The aim of this study was to examine whether the indications for CABG or PCI, as determined by the well-informed intuitive judgment of PCI operators in everyday clinical practice, align with the treatment recommendations outlined in the recently published ESC guidelines. Methods. Between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, patients were recruited from the University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska in Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, utilizing the hospital information system. The study included consecutive patients diagnosed with significant unprotected left main coronary artery disease (≥50% diameter stenosis) confirmed through angiography, who did not exhibit major hemodynamic instability and received PCI at our facility. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the anatomical SYNTAX score i.e. those with SYNTAX ≤ 22 and those with SYNTAX 22. Results. Following inclusion criteria, a total number of 38 patients were included in the analysis. The included patients had either previously diagnosed coronary artery disease or a high suspicion of coronary artery disease. The majority of the participants were male, with an average age of 65.6 years, with the youngest participant being 31 years old and the oldest 83 years old. A large majority of both sexes suffered from arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes. Participants in whom SYNTAX score was ≤ 22 were younger (p=0.049) and had less complex coronary artery disease i.e. fewer MEDINA 1,1,1 (p 0.001) with less stents implanted (p=0.040). Over the course of one year of follow-up, three patients passed away, two of whom had a SYNTAX score exceeding 22. Additionally, two patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusion. The present study demonstrates that an intuitive decision-making process by experienced interventional cardiologists for choosing the optimal myocardial revascularization method for the individual patient with left main stenosis led to a discordance of the definitely chosen methods vs. the recommended method based on the SYNTAX score and ESC guidelines. This discordance between the recommended and the finally performed revascularization strategy led to a higher shortterm mortality.
Brkic et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Discordance between recommended and performed revascularization methods for left main stenosis led to higher short-term mortality, particularly in patients with SYNTAX > 22.