India carried out the execution of Dhananjay Chatterjee in 2004, who was a security guard convicted for the 1990 rape and murder of a schoolgirl in Kolkata. This case became a landmark in India’s death penalty discourse, not only because it ended a long gap in executions, but because it exposed how capital punishment operates at the inter section of public outrage, judicial reasoning and procedural failures. In this chapter we examine the factual background, trail-to-appeal trajectory, and the reliance on the “rarest of rare” doctrine to justify the ultimate sentence. It also examines the execution within wider debates on delay, deterrence and the risk of irreversible error, showing how one case can shape both public memory and legal policy around the death penalty.
Mahaditya Roy (Tue,) studied this question.