As the supply chain of the electric vehicle (EV) industry becomes increasingly complex and vulnerable, traditional supplier evaluation methods reveal inherent limitations. These approaches primarily emphasize static performance while neglecting dynamic future risks. To address this issue, this study proposes a comprehensive supplier evaluation model that integrates a hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) framework with the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, contextualized for the EV sector. The hybrid AHP-TOPSIS framework is first applied to rank suppliers based on multidimensional performance criteria, including quality, delivery capability, supply stability and scale. Subsequently, the XGBoost algorithm uses historical monthly data to capture nonlinear relationships and predict future supplier risk probabilities. Finally, a risk-adjusted framework combines these two components to construct a dynamic dual-dimensional performance–risk evaluation system. A case study using real data from an automobile manufacturer demonstrates that the hybrid AHP–TOPSIS model effectively distinguishes suppliers’ historical performance, while the XGBoost model achieves high predictive accuracy under five-fold cross-validation, with an AUC of 0.851 and an F1 score of 0.928. After risk adjustment, several suppliers exhibiting high performance but elevated risk experienced significant declines in their overall rankings, thereby validating the robustness and practicality of the integrated model. This study provides a feasible theoretical framework and empirical evidence for EV enterprises to develop supplier decision-making systems that balance performance and risk, offering valuable insights for enhancing supply chain resilience and intelligence.
Yan et al. (Sun,) studied this question.