Abstract Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) represent a family of proteins that given their structural peculiarity, that is, absence of defined secondary or tertiary structures, are very flexible and display great adaptability in binding to other molecules. For these reasons, IDPs are often key nodes in modulatory molecular networks. While 3D‐structured proteins undergo aggregation and precipitation in denaturing conditions, due to the exposure of their hydrophobic core to the aqueous environment, IDPs are instead refractory to aggregation due to their naturally disordered state. This peculiarity has prompted the use of harsh conditions (i.e., heat or low pH) to selectively extract IDPs from complex protein samples. Here we provide the first comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the two strategies commonly adopted to enrich for IDPs, that is, heat‐ and perchloric acid‐based extractions. We find that both methods allow the study of the intrinsically disordered “dark side” of the proteome, while displaying acute differences in their ability to enrich these peculiar IDPs.
Secco et al. (Tue,) studied this question.