What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to compare the accuracy of different measurement methods for assessing peri-implant defects.

January 24, 20260 citations

Comparative Evaluation of Direct and Digital Measurements of Peri-implant Defects Using CBCT, Ultrasound, and Intraoral Scanning.

MTMahmure Ayşe Tayman KKKıvanç Kamburoğlu EÇEsra Ece Çakmak

Key Points

This research aims to compare the accuracy of different measurement methods for assessing peri-implant defects.
Evaluated measurement accuracy using three modalities: CBCT, ultrasound (US), and intraoral scanning (IOS).
Compared results against direct measurements for multiple defect types.
Analyzed measurement variability and agreement among the different methods.
CBCT showed the highest agreement with direct measurements.
Ultrasound followed with a moderate level of agreement.
Intraoral scanning exhibited greater variability in measurements.
Defect type significantly impacted the accuracy of the measurements.

Abstract

CBCT showed the highest agreement with direct measurements, followed by US, while IOS exhibited greater variability. Defect type and measurement modality were the primary determinants of accuracy. These findings indicate that CBCT and US can be considered reliable tools for assessing peri-implant bone defects.

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tayman et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697461a8bb9d90c67120b84a https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twag006

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper