Abstract Trusses very often consist of monosymmetric and built‐up compressed members, which may fail in torsional or flexural‐torsional buckling, potentially leading to the collapse of structures. Previous studies have demonstrated that these phenomena may be relevant in case of fire and are not adequately considered in design standards, and improved design equations were proposed to increase the safety of these members at elevated temperatures. As a further step, machine learning (ML) models are developed in this study, providing accurate yet fast calculation models for compressed members belonging to truss systems. This work describes the development of Artificial neural networks, Random Forests and Support Vector Regression, building upon a numerical dataset of the compressive capacity of members with angles, tee or cruciform sections and different lengths and sectional dimensions. The machine learning models are explained using a combination of partial dependence plots and SHapley Additive exPlanations. The accuracy versus safety trade‐off is discussed for a better‐informed model selection. It is shown that ML models are more accurate than the analytical method.
Possidente et al. (Mon,) studied this question.