This study presents a comparative assessment of the Johnson–Cook (J-C) and Ductile Damage (DD) material models, evaluating their capability to replicate the tensile behavior and fracture development in ductile metals. Numerical models of AL6063-T4 aluminium and A36 steel dog-bone specimens with two different thicknesses were developed in ABAQUS to assess force–displacement response, stress–strain characteristics, and crack evolution under quasi-static loading. Results showed that specimen thickness directly doubled load capacity, while both models captured the overall elastic and plastic behavior of the materials. A key finding is that the DD model provided yield stresses closely matching the reference material values, whereas the J-C model exhibited higher apparent yields due to its intrinsic strain-rate sensitivity. Differences in damage behavior were also pronounced: the DD model better reproduced the gradual, inclined fracture path in aluminium, while the J-C model more accurately captured the strong necking-localization response characteristic of steel. Comparisons with experimentally tested specimens further supported these fracture tendencies. By analysing both materials under identical conditions, this work highlights the relative strengths and limitations of the two fracture formulations. The originality of the study lies in its systematic comparison across materials and thicknesses, providing clear guidance for selecting appropriate constitutive models in structural and computational mechanics research.
Al-Rifaie et al. (Thu,) studied this question.