BACKGROUND: Identifying patients with chronic coronary syndrome who will benefit most from a coronary revascularization strategy is essential. Data on the performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to guide revascularization are limited. To assess the long-term prognostic impact of stress CMR-guided revascularization strategy to predict all-cause death. METHODS: We conducted an observational study including all consecutive patients who underwent stress CMR for suspected or known chronic coronary syndrome in 3 centers in France. CMR-guided coronary revascularization was defined as any revascularization performed within 90 days following stress CMR. The primary outcome was all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 50 701 patients were included (mean age, 64±12 years; 68.5% men). After a median follow-up of 7.2 years (interquartile range, 3.0–11.0), 3665 (7.2%) patients died. Among the 7396 patients with ischemia, 6523 (88%) underwent revascularization. Ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) without viability were independent predictors of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.67 99.5% CI, 3.15–4.27 and adjusted hazard ratio, 1.26 99.5% CI, 1.10–1.44, respectively; P <0.001 for both). CMR-guided revascularization was an independent predictor of improved survival in the overall population (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30 99.5% CI, 0.25–0.36). In a 1:1 propensity-matched cohort of 1700 patients, CMR-guided revascularization remained independently associated with a lower incidence of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37 99.5% CI, 0.28–0.50; P <0.001). This beneficial effect was observed in patients without LGE or with LGE and viability ( P <0.001 for both), but not in those with LGE without viability ( P =0.23). CONCLUSIONS: In this registry of consecutive patients with chronic coronary syndrome from 3 centers, stress CMR-guided revascularization was associated with a lower rate of death. The combined assessment of inducible myocardial ischemia and LGE may help to select patients most suitable for revascularization.
Viboud et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: