Objectives To develop and validate a tool for standardised quality assessment of data-driven algorithms in healthcare, focusing on the underlying data pipeline. Methods Data Assessment Tool for Algorithm Critical Appraisal and Robust Evidence (DATA-CARE) was iteratively developed from the established Quality In Prognosis Studies framework, selected after reviewing 10 existing quality assessment tools for observational and artificial intelligence studies. DATA-CARE evaluates five quality domains of the data pipeline: study population, data, algorithm, outcome and report transparency. Each domain comprises three to five quality criteria. With a total score of 75 points, study quality is categorised as low (<45), moderate (45–59) or high (≥60). DATA-CARE was validated during a systematic review on data-driven algorithms using continuous physiological monitoring data within the paediatric intensive care unit. Two independent reviewers performed quality assessment using DATA-CARE of included studies. Tool validation was evaluated using inter-rater agreement and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results DATA-CARE demonstrated robust inter-rater agreement (93.5%) with ICC 0.98 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99). Of 3858 screened studies, 31 were reviewed in the use case, describing diverse algorithms. Studies were predominantly low (32.3%) to moderate (41.9%) and sporadically (25.8%) high quality. Discussion Predominance of low-to-moderate quality studies reveals critical barriers to clinical implementation of data-driven algorithms, including low quality data capture and processing, lacking validation strategies and non-transparent reporting of findings. Conclusions DATA-CARE allows standardised and reliable critical appraisal for a wide variety of algorithms, addressing current gaps in standardised and reproducible algorithm development.
Twist et al. (Sun,) studied this question.