Following transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair, patients with HFrEF had higher 1-year mortality than those with preserved LVEF (p=0.008), and HFpEF had poorer survival than iRHF (p=0.035).
Cohort
Sí
Does baseline left-sided heart failure profile affect 1-year mortality in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair?
1,773 patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER), mean age 79±7 years, 53% female.
Transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER)
Comparison across different baseline left-sided heart failure profiles (HFrEF vs HFpEF vs isolated right heart failure)
1-year all-cause mortalityhard clinical
In patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair for severe tricuspid regurgitation, the presence and severity of left-sided heart failure significantly worsen 1-year mortality, with isolated right heart failure showing the most favorable outcomes.
Abstract Background Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is frequently associated with left-sided heart failure (HF), and both conditions contribute to a poor prognosis. Transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has emerged as a treatment option for patients with severe TR; however, the influence of left-sided HF on outcomes remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the impact of T-TEER across different left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) profiles. Methods Data from the European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Tricuspid Regurgitation (EuroTR registry) were analyzed to assess the effect of LVEF on 1-year all-cause mortality following T-TEER. Patients were categorized into those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF 50%) and those with preserved LVEF (LVEF ≥50%). The latter group was further stratified based on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) into those with PCWP ≤15 mmHg (isolated right heart failure, iRHF) and those with PCWP 15 mmHg (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, HFpEF). Results A total of 1,773 patients (mean age 79±7 years, 53% female) were included. Of these, 532 (30%) had HFrEF, while 1,241 (70%) had preserved LVEF. PCWP data were available for 582 patients (47%), with 213 (37%) classified as iRHF and 369 (63%) as HFpEF. Regardless of LVEF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved in all groups (p0.001). Patients with HFrEF exhibited higher 1-year mortality compared to those with preserved LVEF (p log-rank=0.008, Figure 1A). Within the preserved LVEF group, HFpEF patients had poorer survival than those with iRHF (p log-rank=0.035, Figure 1B). Residual TR severity ≤II after T-TEER was comparable between HFrEF and HFpEF patients (78% vs. 83%) and highest in the iRHF group (87%, p=0.014). Conclusion The majority of patients undergoing T-TEER present with left-sided HF, with HFpEF being the most prevalent subtype. While functional improvements were observed across all subgroups, outcomes worsened as LVEF declined. Patients with iRHF demonstrated the highest procedural success rates and the lowest 1-year mortality, identifying for the first time a distinct cohort with a favourable response to therapy, warranting further investigation into its underlying pathophysiology.Figure 1A and 1B
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
A Schoeber
Sebastian Rosch
K Rommel
European Heart Journal
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schoeber et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=1,773). Transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) vs. Different LVEF profiles (HFrEF vs preserved LVEF; iRHF vs HFpEF) was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (p=0.008). Following transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair, patients with HFrEF had higher 1-year mortality than those with preserved LVEF (p=0.008), and HFpEF had poorer survival than iRHF (p=0.035).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586388f7c464f2300a2fb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2388
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: