Abstract Background 99mTc-labelled cardiac scintigraphy enables noninvasive diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Guidelines recommend using planar semiquantitative (heart to contralateral ratio, H/CL) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) qualitative visual grading for diagnostic interpretation. However, planar imaging has inherent limitations, and visual grading is prone to interobserver variability, underscoring the need for standardized quantitative assessment. We developed a 3D volumetric quantitative score (3D Score) and assessed its diagnostic performance compared to myocardial tissue, the gold standard for ATTR-CM diagnosis. Methods At a single, tertiary referral center, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients from 06/2017 to 06/2024 who underwent 3-hour 99mTc-pyrophosphate or 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate planar and SPECT/CT for suspected ATTR-CM and had archived myocardial tissue (biopsy or myectomy). On planar imaging, H/CL was calculated. On SPECT/CT, volumes of interest were drawn around the entire left ventricle (LV), avoiding calcifications, and within the right atrium (RA) blood pool. Mean uptake values were used to calculate the 3D Score (LVmean:RAmean), Fig 1A. Myocardial tissue was stained via sulfated Alcian blue and/or Congo red histochemistry. Once histologically confirmed, amyloid deposits were subtyped by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The diagnostic performance of H/CL and 3D Score was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and predictive characteristics were defined. ROC areas under the curve (AUC) were compared using Delong test. Optimal cutoffs were determined using Youden’s J statistic. Baseline characteristics (demographics, echocardiogram, biomarkers) and H/CL were compared between patients above and below 3D Score cutoff. Results 239 patients were identified (median age 72 65-78, 78% male, 46% ATTR positive). Median time between cardiac scintigraphy and myocardial tissue collection was 22 (6-65) days. Distribution of the 3D Score stratified by ATTR-CM status is illustrated in Fig 1B-C. The discriminative ability of the 3D Score was excellent (AUC 0.92) and superior to H/CL (0.87, p =0.006, Fig 1D-E). The optimal 3D Score cutoff for identifying ATTR-CM was ≥1.0 with sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) 90%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 89%. The optimal H/CL ratio cutoff for identifying ATTR-CM was ≥1.4 with sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 86%, PPV 81%, NPV 78%. Baseline characteristics of the overall cohort stratified by 3D Score are displayed in Table 1. Conclusions The 3D Score demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for detecting ATTR-CM and was superior to current quantitative metrics. Future studies are needed to externally validate its performance across diverse patient cohorts and imaging centers and to investigate correlation with myocardial amyloid burden. Figure 1
Tersalvi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.